Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Field Efficacy of Neonicotinoids and Spinosad for Control of Western Cherry Fruit Fly in Tart Cherry
  • Diane Alston, Department of Biology
  • Utah State University
  • Michael Reding, USDA-ARS
  • Wooster, OH
2
WCFF Management in Western U.S. Cherry Orchards
  • Primary insect pest of western cherry orchards
  • Zero tolerance for larvae in fruit
  • FQPA – loss of OPs
  • Guthion – future uncertain
    • Limited to 3 lb/acre (2 appls./ season
    • 15 d REI / 15 d PHI
  • Neonicotinoids and spinosad most promising alternatives


3
I. Prevention of Fruit Injury
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
Conclusions – Fruit Injury
  • Provado (14 d) performed better than Calypso (14 d)
  • Spinosad (7 d) performed better than Spinosad (14 d)
  • Provado (14 d) & Spinosad (7 d) were comparable to Guthion (14 d)
8
II. Suppression of Adult Populations
9
Influence of Neonicotinoids on Adult Populations in Small Plots - 2001
10
 
11
 
12
Conclusions – Adult Suppression
  • Neonicotinoids: poor to moderate adulticide activity with high WCFF populations
    • Ovicidal and/or larvicidal activity, and/or inhibition of oviposition must be more important than adulticidal activity
  • Spinosad (GF-120 NF Bait): good adulticide (only 1 year data)
  • GF-120 NF Bait & Guthion suppressed adult populations for up to 1 month post-harvest (only 1 year data)


13
III. Stimulation of Spider Mite Populations
14
 
15
 
16
Conclusions – Mite Stimulation
  • Multiple applications (2-3) of neonicotinoids (Provado & Calypso) can stimulate phytophagous mite reproduction
  • Not caused by toxicity to predaceous mites
  • Hormoligosis